Posts Tagged ‘accounts payable’
Duncan Jones, senior analyst at Forrester, gives a detailed account of why companies should embrace electronic invoicing.
A recent survey by the US Institute of Management and Administration found that the average administration cost per invoice is €30. Even more worrying, 70% of the AP managers surveyed did not know the figure for their own company. Yet companies that have implemented accounts payable electronic invoice presentment and payment (AP-EIPP) report huge savings and massive ROI. Finance directors with significant AP processing costs who haven’t yet done so should make it a priority to consider AP-EIPP and include it in their enterprise application strategies.
Humans are expensive and error-prone
Forrester Research has interviewed dozens of companies using AP-EIPP to find out what they have done and why. Our respondents cited three key issues driving the project’s business case. Prior manual processes, they told us, were:
Too slow to capture payment discounts and honour contracted payment terms.
One company had such a large backlog that many invoices were already overdue for payment before they were first touched by an AP clerk.
An expensive non-value-adding activity.
Our research aligns with the IOMA survey of cost per invoice ranging from €10 to €100.
The main cost driver is the number of invoices that cannot be successfully validated first time e.g. because they do not reference or have a different price to supporting purchase orders (POs).
Unreliable, often failing to spot invoice errors.
AP clerks may ignore price differences, wave through extra charges and even process duplicate invoices for a single service.
Prior AP improvement efforts had limited success
Many finance directors initiated projects that focused internally on AP, resulting in incomplete solutions that failed to address the underlying causes of invoice processing problems. Business process outsourcing (BPO) is an example – certainly there are savings from labour arbitrage and economies of scale, but its better to eliminate manual processes than merely make them slightly cheaper and faster.
Document management systems (DMS) are another superficially attractive option that look good on paper, if you’ll pardon the pun, but under-deliver in practice. Sellers of DMS, which combine scanning, optical character recognition (OCR) and work flow, sometimes convince FDs that all their problems can be solved by turning the paper into electronic images, but this isn’t true. DMS can’t parse sufficient data from the invoice image to drive automatic matching and approval, so they do little to reduce the problem invoices that cause all the work. They do, however, enable BPO and shared service centres to dump the discrepancy resolution effort back on the requisitioning departments and claim that as an efficiency gain.
AP-EIPP products automate the Invoice-to-Pay process
So why do so many companies still use people? Because until recently, the absence of document standards meant that human beings were essential to process unfamiliar invoice layouts and parse out vital information and key data into the AP system.
AP-EIPP products automate and streamline the Invoice-to- Pay (I2P) process in four stages: receiving electronic invoices (e-invoices) instead of paper, transforming it into a usable form, validating it with supporting records, and passing approved invoices through to payment (see Figure 1). Complete EIPP solutions, either from a single provider or assembled by a system integrator, will:
Enable suppliers to submit invoices electronically.
Ideally, e-invoicing solutions accept data direct from suppliers’ sales order processing systems, but they also provide websites for suppliers to manually input or upload invoices online. Solutions should include OCR for suppliers who cannot or will not support true e-invoicing.
Transform the data into a usable format and layout.
Without universal data standards, systems have to be trained to recognise each supplier’s file layout and work out what each bit of data represents from its position in the file or how it is labelled. For example, a supplier may send data in a tagged format such as XML, but the EIPP system has to learn that the field labelled ‘your reference’ is the same as what it calls ‘PO number.’ Advanced products also apply business rules to validate the invoice and correct simple mistakes.
Validate data, using supporting records and discrepancy approval work flows.
AP-EIPP products match invoices with POs goods received notes (GRNs) and other supporting records. They use business rules to wave through immaterial differences, such as small additional freight charges of low value, and route exceptions to the appropriate person for review and action.
Provide process monitoring and invoice status reports.
AP-EIPP products provide portals so that buyers’ AP- and suppliers’ AR-clerks can track invoice status and expedite as appropriate. Key performance indicator (KPI) reporting helps management prioritise action to reduce invoice discrepancies and increase straight through processing (STP). The best products include a ‘pay-me-now’ feature so suppliers can dynamically ask to get paid faster, either by the customer, in return for an early payment discount, or by a third party supply chain finance (SCF) provider.
Impressive results
After speaking to a number of companies that have implemented AP-EIPP, three key themes have consistently emerged. The consensus is that enterprises embarking on an EIPP project should:
Initiate a cross-functional I2P improvement program.
All top-level stakeholders must support the initiative or it may be seen as an IT-driven project, or a scheme by the finance department to pass its work to other departments.
Aim for 100% STP.
Project teams should consider every invoice category and envisage how human intervention could be minimised, if not eliminated. I advise clients to think in terms of ‘yes, if…’ instead of ‘no, because …’. Our best case studies found ways to cut manual steps for even the most intractable categories such as complex field services.
Focus on maximising supplier participation.
STP, discrepancy notification and access to SCF enable suppliers that e-invoice to get paid faster than those who stick to paper – which is especially important in today’s economy.
Finance directors should evaluate what AP-EIPP can do for them.
The AP-EIPP market is growing by nearly 30% per year. The potential benefits – lower administration costs, better visibility and reduced error rates – are clear. Now is a good time for FDs to learn more about the technology, and how it could help them streamline their I2P processes. A good way to start is by formalising the collection of KPIs such as administration cost per invoice, % of invoices supported by PO, and % matched first time without errors. This data can help FDs identify where there is the greatest scope for improvement – such as which expense categories cause most problems for the AP department and what would have to be done to achieve 100% STP? Above all, FDs should look for a complete solution and set the goal of getting most suppliers submitting invoices electronically, with the maximum possible straight through processing.
Well-attended Webinar enables the leading global e-Invoicing network to outline why e-Invoicing is a viable alternative to OCR.
OB10, the leading global e-Invoicing network, hosted the February 26 Webinar titled E-Invoicing vs. OCR, Getting the Most from Invoice Automation. The Webinar attracted over 130 participants eager to learn the benefits of e-Invoicing and why it is a viable alternative to OCR.
The Webinar outlined the challenges companies face when managing an end-to-end paper invoice process and how OB10 helps to streamline that process. Financially, implementing an e-Invoicing solution requires no upfront capital expense, no licensing or maintenance fees, eliminates tasks and labor, and offers a much stronger and faster return on investment than OCR.
“There remains over 80 percent paper entrenched in today’s Accounts Payable departments and many organizations unfortunately choose OCR because they believe it will provide a significant level of automation and efficiency,” says Thayer Stewart, vice president, marketing and business development - OB10. “Many of those same companies are finding that once they’ve spent hundreds of thousands of dollars and significant resources implementing an OCR solution, it’s not all it’s promised to be because you’re still dealing with paper. With e-Invoicing, the implementation is faster, the investment is only a fraction of the cost of implementing OCR and it’s a much more reliable solution.”
There remains over 80 percent paper entrenched in today’s Accounts Payable departments and many organizations unfortunately choose OCR because they believe it will provide a significant level of automation and efficiency. At the end of the day, e-Invoicing offers much better business performance, greater compliance and substantial cost savings over OCR.Te more organizations look at e-Invoicing as a viable alternative to OCR, the more we believe they’ll make the decision to choose solutions like OB10.OCR also requires a significant investment in the installation of specific software and hardware in an Accounts Payable department that extracts invoice data from an actual paper invoice. On the other hand, e-Invoicing offers a hosted electronic network of receiving and delivering invoices (no hardware or software to install), suppliers submit invoices via a file upload or by keying into an online portal, and the cost is minimal - usually a low per-invoice transaction fee that is often less than sending invoices through the mail. With OCR, there isn’t much automation. With e-Invoicing, automation is guaranteed.
In addition, a supplier like OB10 specializes in supplier on-boarding; ensuring that a buyer’s suppliers are enrolled in the network and ready to transact. Typically many suppliers are already members of the OB10 network, making it easier for new buyer customers who choose OB10.
“At the end of the day, e-Invoicing offers much better business performance, greater compliance and substantial cost savings over OCR,” added Stewart. “The more organizations look at e-Invoicing as a viable alternative to OCR, the more we believe they’ll make the decision to choose solutions like OB10.”
Kofax plc (LSE: KFX), the leading provider of Intelligent Capture & Exchange solutions, today announced that it has acquired the shares of OptiInvoice Digital Technology AB (“OptiInvoice”), a Scandinavian company that develops and markets electronic invoice and other document processing software.
Headquartered in Stockholm, Sweden, OptiInvoice provides software that allows electronic invoices and other documents to be digitally encrypted and transmitted or submitted via e-mail and other data streams in standard text, image and extensible markup language (XML) file formats. It then allows the recipient to accept and process those same files.
The software eliminates the need to print, mail, receive and process paper-based invoices and other documents, thereby significantly reducing otherwise manual labor processes and costs, improving the accuracy of the related data and accelerating processing times. This enables better accounts payable management to ensure that all application terms, conditions and discounts are fully utilized.
The majority of invoices and other documents continue to originate in a paper format but many companies and government agencies are gradually migrating to electronic formats to improve efficiency and lower costs. As a result, the adoption of electronic invoice and other document processing software is accelerating and users are in need of a capture solution capable of accommodating both paper and electronic formats.
The combination of the OptiInvoice software with existing Kofax Capture and Transformation Modules software addresses these market requirements. The OptiInvoice and Kofax software products have been successfully integrated, and the integrated solution will be released during the current calendar quarter.
“This acquisition is a natural extension of our intention to grow both organically as well as through the acquisition of synergistic software companies and products,” said Reynolds C. Bish, Chief Executive Officer at Kofax. “It also begins to level the competitive landscape in the invoice processing segment of the capture market, where we previously needed to partner with a third party to provide these capabilities while our most direct competitor could already offer a complete solution. This should enable us to accelerate our revenue growth in this important and rapidly-growing segment of the capture market.”
Kofax has paid 2.00 million Euros (£1.57 million) in cash upon the closing of the acquisition, a portion of which will be held in escrow for a period of time. Further conditional payments estimated to be in the range of 1.31 million Euros up to a maximum of 10.00 million Euros (£1.03 to £7.84 million) may be made during the ensuing 4 years subject to the achievement of certain performance criteria and the retention of certain employees. The acquisition is expected to be EBITA neutral in the current financial year and accretive thereafter. OptiInvoice broke even in the year ended December 31, 2007, and at December 31, 2007 reported gross assets of £205,479.
About Kofax plc
Kofax plc (LSE: KFX) is the leading provider of Intelligent Capture & Exchange solutions. For more than 20 years, Kofax has provided award-winning solutions that automate document-driven business processes by managing the transformation and exchange of business-critical information arising in paper, fax and electronic formats in a more accurate, timely and cost-effective manner. These solutions provide a verifiable return on investment to thousands of customers in financial services, manufacturing, retail, government, healthcare, business process outsourcing and other markets. Kofax delivers these solutions through its own sales and service organisations, and a global network of more than 1,200 authorised partners in more than 60 countries throughout the Americas, EMEA and Asia Pacific.
Source: http://www.kofax.com/
As the dust begins to settle from PayStream’s first annual electronic invoicing summit, The Next Generation of E-Payables: Electronic Invoicing and Supply Chain Finance, and before I go back to work on our Spring Summit 2009, I thought I’d take a few minutes to reflect on the week’s events.
The inspiration for the Summit was PayStream’s consulting, research reports, and one specific study our research division has been conducting for the last several months regarding the state of AP automation in U. S. companies. The findings were unveiled at the Summit and the eInvoicing Adoption Survey Report released this week. LINK
Common themes emerged from the conference delegates. Many admitted that imaging and OCR were great first steps, but they found it was time to take their AP departments to the next level in automation and to begin exploring advanced options like electronic invoicing.
Organizations just getting started on the path to automation expressed relief when they discovered many of the options that technology providers offered could be tailored and implemented a la carte. You don’t have to automate the entire process all at once.
Of course, everyone wants to know how to make the implementation process a success, but making that happen depends on variables, often times out of your control. This was addressed in the morning panel discussions when panelists offered anecdotes for how to be successful.
The moral of the stories was: 1. Executive sponsorship and cross departmental collaboration is key. You need all departments on board and you need your executive leadership to fully understand and support the project to have any chance of automating your accounts payable, and 2. Take time prior to implementation to get an accurate estimate of the current state of your payables, even if this means stretching your timeline an additional 3-6 months.
And the question addressed most often; how do we get our suppliers on board? The answer was a unanimous recommendation to approach your vendor pool with an air of collaboration and be willing to work with individual vendors who may be on separate platforms. Often times, a solution provider will handle supplier on-boarding for you.
Now, getting back to the survey results from the PayStream eInvoicing Adoption Survey Report. Amid all the findings, we see most clearly that paper is on the way out and it’s on the way out fast. By 2010 we anticipate electronic invoices exceeding the number of paper invoices processed by Fortune 500 companies in the U. S.
Source: PayStream Voices
Oracle On Demand customers can now rapidly extend their Oracle financials solutions to include the 170 MarkView Financial Suite, a set of products from 170 Systems that integrates unstructured content such as paper, faxes, spreadsheets, and e-mail into key finance processes, from accounts payable to asset management.
“Because our products are already deeply integrated with Oracle E-Business Suite and PeopleSoft Enterprise financial applications, On Demand customers can simply ‘turn on’ our solutions as needed,” explains Karl Büttner, chairman and chief technology officer of 170 Systems, Inc.
“Since Oracle provides the hardware and manages the database platform on which 170 MarkView Financial Suite runs, this solution is powered by Oracle On Demand,” says Büttner.
The 170 MarkView Financial Suite integrates all unstructured content associated with a given transaction-paper, fax, electronic data interchange (EDI), electronic invoices, spreadsheets and e-mail-directly into Oracle E-Business Suite and PeopleSoft Enterprise financials applications.
The result: On Demand customers strengthen internal controls, lower transaction costs, promote adoption of self-service solutions, and enable e-invoicing.
Lowering the Cost of Compliance
By automating the integration of unstructured content, the 170 MarkView Financial Suite lowers costs even as it reduces the risks inherent in dispersed, paper-based systems.
And internal controls guarantee segregation of duties for each transaction.
“We turn core financial functions into self-documenting, Sarbanes-Oxley-compliant processes with comprehensive audit trails and real-time monitoring,” says Büttner.
The 170 MarkView products also shrink transaction costs and timelines, thanks to automatic routing of each transaction and its associated information to the appropriate individual for review, coding, and approval.
And by automating processes and bringing them online, the 170 MarkView Financial Suite enables self service as well as real-time audit capabilities.
“The beauty of this partnership is that our products are in tight coordination with Oracle financial application products and live on Oracle On Demand,” Büttner adds. “That means customers get all these benefits of the software with simplified, proven integration and with a single point of accountability for the management of their solutions.”
Source: Oracle
Technology has had a significant influence on commercial banking, says Ian Watkinson, head of e-invoicing, Royal Bank of Scotland. “The internet has changed the way we do business forever and there is a greater drive for automation and a genuine move away from paper,” he says.
In June, RBS entered into a multi-year electronic invoicing agreement with Accountis, a developer of secure financial document exchange and payment systems. The white label agreement will enable RBS to provide a VAT-compliant e-invoicing service to its corporate customers.
“For our customers we see e-invoicing as a fast-track to saving time and money. In addition to eliminating paper and automating manual processes, users of the service will quickly benefit from real-time document management, faster settlements and better working capital optimisation,” says Watkinson.
Transaction-based services such as e-invoicing are becoming more important as financial institutions seek to recoup revenues lost in other areas of banking such as investment banking and payments. E-invoicing is considered a first step in automating the financial supply chain – the flavour of the month in commercial banking. George Ravich, chief marketing officer at Accountis’ parent company Fundtech, says there are “many opportunities” for banks to extend their relationships with corporates to provide more fee-based services. Fundtech promotes the concept of “just in time cash”, where banks can service their corporate clients very well by knowing their cash needs at any moment in time. Electronic invoicing is fundamental in this, he says, as it provides the information that is needed throughout the supply chain.
Watkinson says e-invoicing is a strategic addition to RBS’ existing product portfolio. He agrees with Ravich on the significance of e-invoicing: “By offering additional transaction services such as e-invoice delivery, we will gain greater visibility of our customer’s end-to-end, financial supply chain transactions” he says. “This will help us to improve our understanding of their business and strengthen our long-term relationship. It also places us in a better position to offer additional services such as supplier finance provisions and other innovative finance arrangements.”
Along with working capital management, the financial supply chain is seen as an important area where banks can add value for corporate clients. Tom Buschman, founder, chairman and chief executive of corporate standards body Twist Process Innovations, told delegates at the International Payments Summit in London earlier this year that the supply chain was “all about collections”. Companies want predictability in collections processes, he added.
His views were endorsed by a number of other speakers. Ray Zabarte, global head of supply chain finance, transaction banking at Standard Chartered Bank said supply chain finance was about “getting information sooner” and the ideal would be to get information directly, in real time, from corporate customers.
Roger Ward, financial services EMEA consultant at CSC Computer Sciences, said that in optimising the use of cash, the company looked to its banks for solutions. However, the offerings are very fragmented, as were the needs of different corporates.
Chris Pickles, head of marketing, BT Global Financial Services, said one of the main problems regarding collections was that “inefficiency makes money”. He wants to know how banks can help speed up the collections process for a large corporate such as BT, which has a wide variety of customers using different payments methods. Top of BT’s wish list is clearing and finality of payments on a T+1 basis. However, there are significant stumbling blocks such as the cheque, which slow down collections considerably.
Electronic invoicing holds promise, he says, because the earlier an invoice is delivered, the earlier a payment could be made and this was applicable all the way through BT’s customer base, down to retail clients. Banks should also work on integrating bank account data to help with reconciliations. “Consolidation and reconciliation are key in the collections process, but we are amazed at the lack of standards in the banking industry. Banks told everyone they were using ISO standards but that is not the case.”
Despite the championing of e-invoicing at conferences and elsewhere, 20 years on from its inception, less than 5% of invoices are electronic, according to the Euro Banking Association. In a study by Cap Gemini, released to coincide with the launch of the single euro payments area, the European Commission identified potential savings of €238 billion through the use of e-invoicing. There are barriers, however, including the fragmented nature of the market (there are around 300 service providers and a wide variety of models) and legal and VAT issues, along with a lack of standards have also contrived to stymie significant growth.
Bo Harald, head of the executive advisors unit at TietoEnator, says one way of accelerating the adoption of e-invoicing would be to declare that “paper invoices have no future”. Harald is chairman of the European Commission’s Expert Group on E-invoicing, which is working to develop a single standard for e-invoicing.
Implementing a bank e-invoicing service within a corporate’s accounts receivable department will improve operational efficiencies, leading to faster payments and reduced days sales outstanding (DSO). This in turn will reduce a corporate’s working capital requirements. A bank can also provide invoice-based financing services such as factoring and reverse factoring. In accounts payable departments, e-invoicing provides an opportunity to implement early payment discounting schemes, reducing overall spend.
In developing its system, RBS wanted to make the service as easy as possible, says Watkinson. “We did not want to force change on our corporates in the way their accounting and ERP systems work. The service is designed to make it easier for corporates to exchange financial trade documents with their suppliers and customers.” While many of RBS’ large corporate clients are happy to make electronic payments, they continue to invoice in paper.
Watkinson says RBS will further develop the service and is investigating the possibility of more closely integrating payments and linking with supplier finance. “In approving invoices more efficiently, customers can get closer to the benefits of the supplier finance model.”
Dave Shilling, a corporate business analyst at software developer Misys, says a major issue in commercial banking is the shrinking of margins. Banks have to look beyond traditional services to improve revenues and they are turning to treasury and transaction banking.
Misys is focusing its attentions on cash pooling and will launch its Global Cash Pooling product at Sibos in Vienna in September. He says cash pooling has been a relatively underdeveloped space in cash management. “Corporates have cash and it is all over the place. They want it in the one place so they have greater visibility and control,” he says.
There are barriers to this, however. For example, regulations can prohibit the free movement of money across borders. There are also cultural barriers – local companies are not always happy for headquarters to centralise cash away from local managers. Banks also present barriers when it comes to cash pooling, says Shilling. “Corporates like the sound of cash pooling services but their banks are reluctant to offer them. Very few banks offer cash pooling as a service and if they do, it is generally expensive and sometimes a bank will insist the corporate moves all of its accounts to be with the providing bank.”
At present, corporates currently have very little overall visibility of the financial supply chain. E-invoicing services can provide detailed status information, such as proof of delivery, acceptance, query and approval status for all documents involved in a business transaction from purchase order to invoice.
Sarah Jones, chief executive of SCF Capital, a boutique merchant bank specialising in supply chain finance, says corporates do not realise they can gain financing much earlier if they invoice electronically. Underlying business models, including terms and conditions, need to be reviewed in order to improve supply chain financing, she said.
However, corporates have to be wary of pushing suppliers to pay too fast if they are financially weak – this would raise their cost of borrowing and reduce their ability to access working capital.
Source: Bankingtech
MasterCard Worldwide today announced that it has integrated the MasterCard Payment Gateway with iPayables’ electronic invoice delivery capabilities to provide expanded payment solutions to corporations and financial institutions.
The combined offering provides a complete procure-to-pay solution that supports settlement using a MasterCard payment card account or electronic funds transfer (EFT).
Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc. (Nasdaq: AAWW), a leading provider of global air cargo assets and services, is the first company to utilize the integrated capabilities of the MasterCard Payment Gateway and iPayables.
“We manage and operate the world’s largest fleet of 747 freighter aircraft, providing a unique value proposition to our customers through highly reliable, cost-efficient assets and operating services,” said Joseph Lopez, Sr. Manager, Indirect Procurement for Atlas Air. “Similarly, the MasterCard Payment Gateway is a highly reliable, cost-efficient service that will streamline the process for paying our suppliers, saving time and money for us and our vendors.”
First introduced in October 2007, the MasterCard Payment Gateway is a flexible enterprise-wide payment processing platform for routing commercial payments between buyers, suppliers and their financial institutions. iPayables is the first non-bank reseller whose functionality is coupled with the MasterCard Payment Gateway, creating an end-to-end solution that offers companies a more streamlined, faster and secure way to make payments.
“The combination of iPayables’ electronic invoicing capabilities with the MasterCard Payment Gateway provides Atlas Air with one efficient and secure B2B payments solution,” said Shari Krikorian, vice president, Advanced Payments, MasterCard Worldwide. “By managing multiple payment types, the MasterCard Payment Gateway is simplifying the historically inefficient, check-dominated process of payment, and solving corporations’ growing demand for straight-through processing.”
Using the MasterCard Payment Gateway, a buyer can initiate payment card and EFT payments directly from its financial system to the banks of its suppliers. Remittance data is provided to both the buyer and supplier to speed up reconciliation processes. No account information is shared between the buyer and supplier, and the supplier does not need to use a point of sale device to originate payment.
“The MasterCard Payment Gateway expands our electronic invoicing capabilities and enables us to provide our customers with a complete payables solution that delivers increased efficiencies for all of their commercial payments needs,” said Ken Virgin, CEO, iPayables.
The modular nature of the MasterCard Payment Gateway also provides financial institutions with an enterprise-wide electronic solution that they can re-brand and make available to their corporate customers, or integrate into their current product offerings to enhance their functionality and efficiency. This can enable them to increase payment volumes without building infrastructure, potentially grow profits with additional fees, deepen customer relationships and differentiate from the competition.
Suppliers that process payments with the MasterCard Payment Gateway enjoy automated payments with straight-through processing, decreased paper check processing costs, automated reconciliation via enhanced remittance information for common payment types and preference among buyers that pay electronically.
Buyers that rely on the MasterCard Payment Gateway can drive efficiencies by streamlining their payment options, integrating with existing accounts payable processes and can potentially save money by enabling one connection. Through this method/gateway, buyers can have one streamlined total payables solution that can help them increase productivity, enhance security and increase profits.
Source: Sibos Online


